What I did to the photo:
1. open in Adobe Photoshop CS2
2. crop the photo
3. duplicate the layer
4. Image/adjustments/ hue/saturation and increase the value of saturation to +72
5. duplicate the layer and change the layer to color burn and put the opacity to 50%
This is a rough and quick enhancement of the "data's head" that I've done on the "AS17-137-21000HR" image.
So, expat....can you see the red line on the "mouth" area now?
Richard C. Hoagland processing was found NOT to be fraudulent!
9 comments:
http://theaccidentalalchemist.blogspot.com/2009/02/moon-robot-investigation-dark-mission.html
I'm obliged to you for your detailed account of the "processing" of this image. I have two questions:
1] What was the original source of this image? The low-res image from the web, or the NASA archive neg (as mine was)?
2] Why would you consider that such drastic color enhancement provides a truer result than simply sharpening the original?
@ expat
1.I take the image from:
http://history.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-137-21000HR.jpg
2. well..I don't consider a drastic color enhancement but this is the result.
Richard C Hoagland DID NOT put the red color on the "data's head"
The red color is there.
I can say for sure that is a robot head or not but you can't say that Richard fake the photo.
It is a robot head?
I don't know.
Could be.
Could be not.
But is quite symmetrical, don't you agree?
>>But is quite symmetrical, don't you agree?<<
To the extent that the two dark depressions that Hoagland and Bara would mistakenly call "yes" are symmetrical about the mid-line, yes. That has no special meaning, however.
So the original of your work was the 1 MB reduction off the web. Do you understand that the NASA archive neg I worked from was a 46MB tiff??????
Whose image do you think would give a truer result?
Expat can you please link for me the adress for the AS17-137-21000HR.tiff so I can downloaded?
Thank you!
Sorry, you have to purchase it. Start here.
Darn!
Well..what can I say...thx..
I might buy it if the cost is not...astronomical.
>>Richard C Hoagland DID NOT put the red color on the "data's head"
The red color is there.<<
Just take a look, in your color-enhanced image, at the moon surface. Disregard the rock-that-looks-vaguely-like-a-skull for a moment. All those reds and greens. If you think that's a true representation of what the surface of the moon looks like, better look around for a nice cozy loony-bin because that's where you're headed, my friend...
HA! HA! HA!
..."cozy loony-bin"...
You're really a funny guy!
I like that.
If I look closely is something "red" even on the eyebrow.
Now, seriously, you may have a point but that color, the red one, is not so important.
The thing is that on that boulder, data's head, meteorite...you name it, on the "mouth" area is a diff color then the rest.
Could be yellow, orange, green.
I don't care.
That is what I believe.
For me is obvious.
..."cozy loony-bin"...
:)))
Post a Comment